The Sports Dean
Just another WordPress.com weblog

Mar
17

In a world where technology takes giants leaps from year to year one sport has so far been extremely reluctant to bring technology to the game.

In recent years we have seen Cricket umpires have the help of video technology, baseball use VT to check if runners have made it to a base, we have the Challenge call in American Football and both Rugby Union and Rugby League have incorporated VT to make critical decisions on tries.

Traditionalists will argue that the game has been around in one form or another for over a century, that talking points will diminish and that simply the game is O.K. as it is now! I argue the other way. As a fan, it pains me time after time to see my team concede blantanly offside goals and have goals not acknowledged as the officials are unsure if the ball has crossed the line (even when 60,000 people have seen it). How long does it take Sky, BBC, ITV or Five to have a replay on our screens of these big moments in games? The answer of course is seconds. Generally these replays are conclusive, if not as in any sport the element of doubt should mean no goal.

Look at Cricket or American Football. Big decisions are decided using technology which could take contests one way or another. Was this change a big deal to the fans, the players or governing bodies, not really is the answer. Things will never be perfect, but if you can have 99.9% certainty that is good enough for me. I propose that FIFA, UEFA the FA or whoever is responsible for bringing such technology in to our game should do so as soon as possible. Hawkeye technology as used in cricket or Cyclops as used in tennis are already there, and could surely be manipulated to aid in decisions with a little bit of trialling.

I have to say, referees come under massive scrutiny when making split second, gut reaction decisions. Get a big enough decisions wrong and some are demoted for not getting it right. Wrong decisions can cost managers their jobs and there can be massive consequences for clubs such as relegation.

There will only be a handful of decisions in each top tier game which require the help of technology, some will take a minute or two to resolve others will take a lot less time. Will fans really be put out by games finishing 10-15 minutes later or having to start 15 minutes earlier, I think not. I’m not asking for every game to have video technology aid the referee, but surely competitions with as much television coverage as the Premier League and the Championship, or leagues like La Liga, Serie A and MLS could incorporate this within weeks of the nod being given by governing bodies. You have to move with technology in any walk of life, why should football be different. If there’s a camera at a game - it can be done. Even Setanta’s Blue Sq Premier League coverage could incorporate such technology, and why not?

Feb
26

Watch any UK Sports channel, read any newspaper and talk football with any Premier League fan and talk of the “BIG 4″ will not be far away. I however would like to challenge the “BIG 4″ theory and suggest in recent years this has become more like the “BIG 6″. This season has seen Liverpool, the weakest of the so-called “BIG 4″ stutter and stammer, with their local foe Everton breathing down their necks. Arsenal have in recent memory been pushed all of the way in the Premier League for 4th spot, only for some dodgy lasagne to scupper Tottenham’s plans to gatecrash the Champions League. This season after two successive 5th place finishes and massive talk of a surge in to the elite this season, Spurs have flattered to deceive. Martin Jol’s public humiliation and replacement with Spaniard, Juande Ramos has however seen Tottenham revitalised in recent months, scaring Man Utd and slaying Arsenal 5-1. Whereas Spurs have left themelves too much to do this year, Everton have gone from strength to strength and look the most likely of the chasing pack to take a Champions League qualification spot away from Liverpool.

Looking back at the FA Cup since 1989, where Man Yoo (6), Arsenal (5), Chelsea (3) and Liverpool (4) have dominated the competition, only Tottenham (1991) and Everton (1994) have been able to steal The Cup away. The Carling Cup in more recent years has shared such a trend with Man Yoo and Chelsea for the main part taking the trophy home. However since 1999 Spurs have reached three finals, winning two (1999 & 2008) and losing one (2002). 2008 has brought with it a possible changing of the guard. Sunday’s epic Carling cup final witnessed a Tottenham team finally come of age, after contributions from great January additions in Alan Hutton and match winner Jonathan Woodgate. But whilst Spurs celebrate an impressive cup win against one of the “untouchables” of the EPL, Everton once again will really be fancying their chances of a Champions League spot. Monday night saw a 2-0 demolition of fellow Champions League aspiring side, Sven Goran Erikkson’s Man City by David Moyes Everton side who have a forward in 16 goal man, Yakubu, capable of unsettling any defence. Moyes may well be the best young British manager around, with signings such as Yakubu, Lescott, Johnson, Howard, Cahill and Arteta creating a formidable core of the side.

Come May, it is more likely we will see a top four consisting of the “BIG 4″, but it is hard to see Everton finishing lower than 5th. Next season do not be surpised to see my “BIG 6″ finish in the top 6 premier league places, but also do not be surprised to see either Tottenham or Everton push one or two of these teams in to the UEFA Cup spots.